So I haven't posted anything in a while. Last post was the beginning of Spring Track of Senior year of high school. Now I am a student at Roanoke College in SW VA and just finished my first cross season as a college athlete. In between these to moments in my life I had my last high school season, as summer filled with running, partying, and no working (it was great).
My last track season was not really what I wanted, but I definitely consider it a successful season for me as an individual. My 3200 meter times went something like this.....10: 44,22,22,23,20,34, then finally ran a 3000 meter in 9:31 which equals to a 10:13 3200 meter. Made it to districts and that was it. I was ninth in the district, when in other districts I would have easily been top six and had gone on to regionals and would have probably beat 10 of the 26 runners there. Kind of ridiculous how slow runners can run at regionals when they just qualified out of place in there district to make it there. I mean I think that they should have people who qualified with time and then added the rest of the top runners from across the region based on times from the district meets. I know this may sound like me just ranting how the system did not benefit me at all, but I actually do believe this would be better. Just because someone was in the top 6 in their district doesnt make them competitive at the region meet. This also goes for the state meet. Its like I would have even been possibly faster than the slowest five guys at the state meet. There were 8 guys that were seeded slower than what I would have been seeded as at the state meet. I am not saying that I should have run at states, but I am saying I believe It would have been reasonable for me to race at regionals considering the people who did run at regionals. And there needs to be more regulation on who makes it to states and regionals.
This last summer, I ran in preparation for cross at Roanoke College. I had pretty good summer, except for three weeks that were pretty blah. One was a sick week, one was beach week, and the other was lack of motivation (i think). So those weeks pissed me off. So my volume wasn't where I wanted to be, but the miles were high in quality, a lot of faster running. I hit like two 50 mile weeks, I intentionally estimate my pace slower than what it may be, so therefore my mileage estimates may be low. Coach Pincus said to hit 50-60 and I did.
Cross season wasn't great. I was here for a week, then got injured. My ankle got stressed out. I believe it was a result of running in Asics which I do not like and from all these hills which I was not used to at all. So that put me out for about 2.5-3 weeks. Got back into running slowly. Didn't race until Oct 9th. I ran a 5k road race. I hit 17:36. I overestimated myself and wanted sub 17. I put that behind me and ran my first XC 8k the next weekend up in MD at Hood College, did not go great, but it was fine with me. I hit 30:55, pretty damn slow, but that was in my flat (bad traction) and it was not a well groomed course. Two weeks after that I ran in the ODAC Championships. I place 61st out of only 85 runners, ran a PR of 30:19 and this was a much hillier course in Lynchburg, VA. It was the hilliest course that I have ever run. I am fairly happy with my season considering my circumstances. I think I could have run like 29:30 possibly and that it is being conservative with my guessing. I want to ask what coach thinks. Null says to think positively, and I do.
Peace